COMORBIDITY & CLL DIFFERENT SCORES – DIFFERENT RESULTS

نویسندگان

چکیده

Introduction: Due to the implementation of outpatient centres, our network provides care for 50% patients with hematological diseases in Vienna. Here we analyse influence own CIRS Score on survival CLL patients. Additionally focus renal comorbidities. Methods: 1150 who were diagnosed, observed and treated between 2011 2021 within haematological analysed. Study data was generated by reviewing electronic paper medical records. Comorbidities assessed conventional including utilizing Version where did not severity detect more We differentiated 2 groups: low risk pts. without any or just one existing co-morbidity high-risk organ systems involved, regardless severity. Moreover demonstrate a Composite Comorbidity “Severe4” <3 >3 points, validated 4 Organ Systems as shown ASH 2022 Shouse et al. cut-off 6 points used German Group. Furthermore Cockcroft-Gault formula (GFR). Results: 55% male. The median age at diagnosis 68 years. IGHV mutated 53% patients, del(17p) present 7,4% 27% received specific treatment. As Figure 1 interpretation CIRS-Score able identify 625 classified high significant lower OS. Regardless Severity, involvement relevant than one. Similarly Severe4 could also show OS difference 167 using 3 Points least category. A highly can be 245 pts when established points. Emphasizing weakness detecting comorbidity due threshold concerning Serum Creatinine 1,5 mg/dl that 144 had GFR <60 mL/min time diagnosis, which reflects Stage CKD, resulting When alone only 31 would have been impaired. Keyword: chronic lymphocytic leukemia (CLL) No conflicts interests pertinent abstract.

برای دانلود رایگان متن کامل این مقاله و بیش از 32 میلیون مقاله دیگر ابتدا ثبت نام کنید

اگر عضو سایت هستید لطفا وارد حساب کاربری خود شوید

منابع مشابه

ReportTwo different hematocrit detection methods : Different methods , different results ?

BACKGROUND: Less is known about the influence of hematocrit detection methodology on transfusion triggers. Therefore, the aim of the present study was to compare two different hematocrit-assessing methods. In a total of 50 critically ill patients hematocrit was analyzed using (1) blood gas analyzer (ABLflex 800) and (2) the central laboratory method (ADVIA(R) 2120) and compared. FINDINGS: Bland...

متن کامل

Nasal Screening for MRSA: Different Swabs – Different Results!

OBJECTIVES Swab-based nasal screening is commonly used to identify asymptomatic carriage of Staphylococcus aureus in patients. Bacterial detection depends on the uptake and release capacities of the swabs and on the swabbing technique itself. This study investigates the performance of different swab-types in nasal MRSA-screening by utilizing a unique artificial nose model to provide realistic a...

متن کامل

Need-based resource allocation: different need indicators, different results?

BACKGROUND A key policy objective in most publicly financed health care systems is to allocate resources according to need. Many jurisdictions implement this policy objective through need-based allocation models. To date, no gold standard exists for selecting need indicators. In the absence of a gold standard, sensitivity of the choice of need indicators is of concern. The primary objective of ...

متن کامل

Metabolic control therapy and biochemical systems theory: different objectives, different assumptions, different results.

The claim by Savageau et al. (1987 a, b, Math. Biosci. 86, 127-145, 147-167) that the theory of metabolic control associated with Kacser & Burns (1973, Symp. Soc. Exp. Biol. 27, 65-104) and with Heinrich & Rapoport (1974, Eur. J. Biochem. 42, 89-102) is no more than a special case of the biochemical systems theory of Savageau and colleagues is examined. It is shown to be based on a misconceptio...

متن کامل

ذخیره در منابع من


  با ذخیره ی این منبع در منابع من، دسترسی به آن را برای استفاده های بعدی آسان تر کنید

ژورنال

عنوان ژورنال: Hematological Oncology

سال: 2023

ISSN: ['1099-1069', '0278-0232']

DOI: https://doi.org/10.1002/hon.3165_585